![]() ![]() ![]() There are three primary streams in Jewish religious practice marked by their levels of adherence to the Pentateuch: Orthodox, Reform, and Conservative. 2 This paper discusses the way that Orthodox Judaism, Catholicism, and Sunni Islam approach medical ethics and examines their stance on issues of dire necessity relating to abortion whereby the clinical context is deemed substantial enough to overturn the normative prohibition against abortion. As a result, various faith groups have tried to profess medical ethics based upon their own sacred law and ethical structure. 1 However, religious beliefs do not fit easily within this four-principle model. The most popular model is that expounded by Beauchamp and Childress, which promotes nonmaleficence, beneficence, respect for autonomy, and justice as its four guiding principles. Modern medical ethics, in its secular form, has focused on the establishment of values and principles that can guide physician-patient interactions within this multicultural context. At times these value and cultural differences between the practitioner and the patient can lead to ethical challenges, and in order to find amicable solutions, understanding each party’s moral values and ethical constructs is of utmost importance. The various ethnic, racial, and religious identities within the patient population lead to a myriad of value systems being at play in the clinical realm. Some questions bioethicists ask include: How should we use a person's genomic data? Should we use animals to grow human organs? How should we distribute a new vaccine? How do we manage cybernetic technologies like the brain-computer interface? A key analysis approach in bioethcs is the four-principle approach developed by Tom Beauchamp and James Childress that consists of four universal principles: (1) autonomy, (2) non-maleficence, (3) beneficence, and (4) justice used in ethical reasoning and decision making.Modern medical practice is becoming increasingly diverse. Bioethics generally includes medical ethics, animal ethics and environmental ethics and how these overlap. Consequences – The outcome of a person's or group's actions will result in the most good for the most people.Īpplied Ethics involves the analysis of specific controversial moral issues such as abortion, euthanasia, animal rights, pollution, etc.īioethics is a field within applied ethics that focuses on ethical issues that relate to biology and biological systems.Duty – It is a person's or group's duty to not hurt another, be fair, treat people as equals, take care of one's self, continue to learn and improve, to follow moral codes, etc.Virtue – A person or group should exhibit good moral character as evidenced by moral behavior.Such standards are often considered using three theories: An example is the 'Golden Rule': Do to others only what you would have them do to you. Normative ethics involves establishing standards that can determine what is right and wrong. Questions that metaethicists ask include: What can we know? What is important? Are their universal truths? Do we have a soul? Is there a god? What does it mean to exist? These can be physical like a galaxy, rock or person, or nonphysical like a thought, spirit or god. Metaethics focuses on what exists in the universe. There are 3 ares of ethics: metaethics, normative ethics and applied ethics. What is the difference between ethics and bioethics?Įthics is a broad field that seeks to understand concepts of right and wrong. ![]()
0 Comments
Leave a Reply. |
AuthorWrite something about yourself. No need to be fancy, just an overview. ArchivesCategories |